Tag: Supreme Court

The ruling upends more than two centuries of legal precedent, for the first time shielding U.S. presidents from criminal accountability.

Supreme Court’s seismic decision strips federal agencies of interpretive authority, sparking immediate legislative action from progressive lawmakers to safeguard public health, labor rights, and environmental protections.

In a 6-3 decision, "justices issued separate concurring and dissenting opinions, suggesting division on the merits of Idaho’s argument."

A recent poll reveals overwhelming support for stricter ethical oversight of Supreme Court justices, transcending political lines.

Clarence Thomas stands alone in dissent as the Supreme Court upholds a law prohibiting domestic abusers from possessing firearms, sparking outrage and renewed calls for judicial accountability.

This has prompted renewed calls for his resignation and demands for stricter ethics reforms for the highest court in the land.

This move follows intense scrutiny of ethical lapses involving Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

These findings raise significant questions about judicial ethics and the potential influence of such gifts on the highest court in the land.

Leaving river protections to states doesn’t make sense when rivers cross state lines.

Top Senate Democrats are urging Chief Justice Roberts to support their call for Justice Samuel Alito's recusal from Trump-related cases, citing concerns over his impartiality due to his display of controversial flags associated with the January 6 insurrection.