Quick summary
• The Trump administration issued an OMB memo freezing federal grants and funding, targeting programs related to healthcare, education, housing assistance, and environmental initiatives.
• The freeze blocked Medicaid portals nationwide, preventing doctors from receiving reimbursements, and disrupted programs like Meals on Wheels, Head Start, and community health centers.
• Critics warned the freeze was an illegal power grab, with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) calling it “a blatant attempt to rip away health care from millions of Americans overnight and will get people killed.”
• A federal judge issued an emergency injunction, halting the freeze just before it was set to take effect, citing constitutional concerns over executive overreach.
• The White House rescinded the memo but not the policy itself, leaving confusion over whether certain programs will continue receiving funding.
• Trump’s nominee for OMB director, Russell Vought, co-authored Project 2025, which calls for defunding social programs and bypassing Congress’ control over federal spending.
• Progressives warn the fight isn’t over, as Trump’s executive orders still aim to cut funding for key social programs, and legal battles over his use of executive power continue.
A sweeping memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ordering a freeze on federal grants, loans, and cooperative agreements sent shockwaves through agencies and organizations across the country this week. The directive, framed as a temporary spending review, immediately disrupted critical programs that millions of Americans rely on daily—including Medicaid reimbursements, Head Start education programs, Meals on Wheels, housing assistance, and scientific research grants.
However, just hours before the funding freeze was set to take effect, a federal judge issued an emergency stay, temporarily blocking the order. As the legal battle over the freeze continues, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are sounding the alarm, warning that the Trump administration’s actions are part of a broader strategy to override Congressional authority over federal spending and impose far-right budget priorities through executive action.
“This is a blatant attempt to rip away health care from millions of Americans overnight and will get people killed,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) after the memo’s details were made public.
Meanwhile, the White House’s response has only added to the confusion. While the OMB later rescinded the memo, officials did not withdraw the funding restrictions themselves, leaving many agencies uncertain about the status of their grants and disbursements.
The OMB directive, issued earlier this week, claimed to temporarily pause federal spending in order to review funding priorities. However, its language made clear that the administration was targeting programs that did not align with Trump’s right-wing agenda.
The memo cited a need to ensure federal dollars were not being used to fund “wokeness,” “Marxist equity,” transgender rights, or “Green New Deal social engineering”—broad and politically charged terms that signal an intent to defund progressive initiatives.
Although the White House insisted that Medicare and Social Security would not be affected, the order froze payments for many essential services, including:
• Medicaid reimbursement portals, blocking payments to physicians nationwide.
• Head Start early childhood education programs, which serve low-income families.
• Meals on Wheels, a program that provides food to seniors and disabled individuals.
• Community health center grants, impacting care for underserved populations.
• Housing vouchers and rental assistance, leaving families at risk of eviction.
By 5:00 PM on Tuesday, states reported that Medicaid portals were already down, blocking payments for doctors treating patients.
Diane Yentel, president of the National Council of Nonprofits, warned of the devastating effects even a short funding freeze could cause:
“From pausing research on cures for childhood cancer to closing homeless shelters, halting food assistance, reducing safety from domestic violence, and shutting down suicide hotlines, the impact of even a short pause in funding could be devastating and cost lives.”
Legal challenges and congressional outrage halt the freeze (temporarily)
As the chaos from the funding freeze escalated, nonprofit organizations and state agencies rushed to challenge the order in court. By Tuesday evening, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan issued an emergency injunction blocking the funding freeze until further review.
The court will hold a full hearing on the case next week, with a final decision expected by Monday, February 3.
Legal experts argue that the memo represents a clear case of executive overreach, as the Constitution grants Congress—not the president—the power of the purse.
“Allowing President Trump’s actions to remain unchallenged sets a dangerous precedent for future brazen power grabs,” stated Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).
Following the court’s decision, the OMB quickly rescinded the memo—but did not reverse the underlying funding restrictions.
“In light of the injunction, OMB has rescinded the memo to end any confusion on federal policy created by the court ruling and the dishonest media coverage,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
However, she clarified that Trump’s executive orders on federal spending reviews “remain in full force and effect” and would be “rigorously implemented by all agencies and departments.”
This statement immediately raised alarms among progressives, who warned that the administration is still working to withhold federal funds in other ways.
“Kick elderly folks off of Meals on Wheels, kick kids off of their healthcare, and then rescind the memo detailing it but not the policy itself,” said Mike Ollen, senior adviser to Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. “Great work all around.”
Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) directly linked the funding freeze to Project 2025, a far-right policy blueprint co-authored by Russell Vought, Trump’s nominee for OMB director.
Project 2025, which outlines a plan to dismantle federal oversight, calls for:
• Eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
• Rolling back transgender rights and environmental policies.
• Defying Congressional control over federal spending to advance conservative priorities.
“No responsible senator of any party should vote to confirm [Russell] Vought to OMB,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), calling the funding freeze “just a taste of the chaos Vought would unleash.”
As Trump seeks to centralize power within the executive branch, Vought’s nomination raises fears that future funding freezes could be used to undermine Congress and enforce a radical right-wing agenda.
Legal and congressional challenges ahead
• The court’s decision on February 3 will determine whether the funding freeze can legally move forward.
• Progressive lawmakers and legal advocates are pushing to block further attempts to weaponize federal spending.
• Democrats in the Senate are being urged to reject Vought’s nomination, arguing that his leadership at OMB would deepen the crisis.
The Trump administration’s attempt to halt federal spending without Congressional approval is part of a broader effort to expand executive power.
Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy for the Center for American Progress, warned:
“This won’t be the last time they try to override the will of the American people.”
Rep. Boyle echoed the concern:
“Even now, the White House is still withholding funding that was approved on a bipartisan basis—including critical infrastructure investments. We must remain vigilant—because Trump and his far-right allies will continue to try and put programs that millions of middle-class families rely on at risk.”
While the funding freeze was temporarily blocked, the underlying policies that drove it remain intact. As Trump continues to use executive authority to sidestep Congress, the legal and political battles over federal spending priorities are far from over.
To join the People’s March and march forward together, click here.
COMMENTS