Quick summary:
• Elon Musk criticized the U.S. healthcare system’s high administrative costs, sparking responses from progressive leaders.
• The U.S. spends $1,055 per capita on healthcare administration, far exceeding other wealthy nations.
• Bernie Sanders and Pramila Jayapal pointed to Medicare for All as a solution to inefficiencies and inequities.
• A 2020 Congressional Budget Office report estimated Medicare for All could save $650 billion annually.
• For-profit insurers operate with 17 percent administrative costs compared to Medicare’s 2 percent.
• Public dissatisfaction with the healthcare system is growing, fueled by issues like denial of coverage and high out-of-pocket costs.
• National Nurses United called single-payer systems “the most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world.”
Elon Musk’s recent social media critique of the U.S. healthcare system’s exorbitant costs has sparked an unexpected alignment with progressive lawmakers advocating for Medicare for All. Musk’s post, which highlighted the nation’s high per capita administrative healthcare expenses, drew responses from Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), both of whom emphasized the inefficiencies and inequities of the for-profit health system.
Musk, a billionaire entrepreneur and incoming head of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Trump administration, shared a graph from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation showing that U.S. administrative healthcare costs reached $1,055 per capita in 2020. These costs significantly outpace those of other OECD countries such as Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Musk’s accompanying question, “Shouldn’t the American people be getting their money’s worth?” ignited debate among advocates of healthcare reform.
“Yes,” responded Sanders. “We waste hundreds of billions a year on healthcare administrative expenses that make insurance CEOs and wealthy stockholders incredibly rich while 85 million Americans go uninsured or underinsured. Healthcare is a human right. We need Medicare for All.”
Jayapal, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and lead sponsor of Medicare for All legislation, echoed Sanders. “Yes, they should be—and I’ve got the solution. It’s called Medicare for All,” she wrote.
The U.S. healthcare system, costing $4.5 trillion annually, is frequently criticized for its inefficiency and inequity. Administrative expenses, which include billing, insurance paperwork, and corporate profits, make up a significant portion of healthcare spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the administrative costs of private insurers average 17 percent, compared to Medicare’s 2 percent.
While Americans pay the most for healthcare among developed nations, outcomes do not match the investment. The average American spends $1,142 annually on out-of-pocket healthcare costs, yet 85 million people remain uninsured or under-insured.
David Sirota, a former speechwriter for Sanders, cited a 2020 CBO report indicating that transitioning to a single-payer healthcare system could save the U.S. $650 billion annually. “Such a system could achieve this in part because Medicare’s 2 percent administrative costs are so much lower than the 17 percent administrative costs of the bureaucratic, profit-extracting private health insurance industry,” Sirota wrote, urging Musk to champion Medicare for All through DOGE.
Musk’s involvement in the healthcare discussion comes as he assumes a prominent role in the Trump administration. Appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk is tasked with reducing wasteful federal spending. While Sanders has criticized Musk’s business practices and the economic system that contributed to his $343.8 billion net worth, the senator has expressed cautious support for some of DOGE’s objectives, particularly those related to cutting waste at the Department of Defense.
However, Musk’s alignment with progressive healthcare advocates remains tenuous. Although he criticized high administrative costs, he has not explicitly endorsed single-payer healthcare or Medicare for All. Musk’s connections to the Trump administration and his status as a billionaire entrepreneur also complicate his role as a potential ally for progressives.
Proponents of Medicare for All argue that a single-payer system would deliver comprehensive healthcare to all Americans while reducing costs. By eliminating the profit-driven insurance industry, the government could redirect funds currently spent on administrative overhead toward patient care.
The proposed system would also address disparities in access to healthcare, a persistent issue in the U.S. Jayapal and Sanders have pointed to successful single-payer models in other OECD countries, where healthcare is treated as a public good rather than a commodity.
National Nurses United, a leading advocate for Medicare for All, emphasized the efficiency of single-payer systems. “The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems,” the group said, urging Musk and others to join the movement.
Musk’s post comes amid heightened public scrutiny of the for-profit healthcare industry. Recent controversies, including Anthem’s reversal of a policy to limit anesthesia coverage and widespread dissatisfaction with insurance practices, have amplified calls for reform.
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson further highlighted public outrage over healthcare inequities. Investigators reported that bullet casings at the crime scene were inscribed with the words “delay” and “deny”—terms often associated with insurance company practices. While the incident remains under investigation, it underscores growing frustration with a system many Americans feel prioritizes profits over patient care.
Musk’s critique of administrative inefficiencies in the healthcare system aligns with a central argument for Medicare for All. However, significant political and corporate opposition remains. For-profit insurers and pharmaceutical companies wield substantial influence in Congress, and systemic reform faces an uphill battle.
Nevertheless, Sanders and Jayapal see Musk’s platform and public attention as a potential opportunity to advance the conversation. By highlighting inefficiencies and proposing solutions, progressives aim to shift the healthcare debate toward systemic change.
“The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world,” National Nurses United reiterated, “have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems.”
To get involved with actions supporting Medicare for All, click here.
To find and contact your state representatives to tell them to support Medicare for All, click here.
COMMENTS