President-elect Donald Trump’s anticipated selection of Senator Marco Rubio as Secretary of State signals a sharp pivot in U.S. foreign policy, with many progressives and analysts concerned over Rubio’s hawkish record and established reputation as a fervent interventionist. Rubio, who has been a vocal supporter of military actions in regions such as Gaza and Iran, could shift the nation’s diplomatic stance to align more aggressively with hardline policies in the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia.
Known for his strident foreign policy positions, Rubio has consistently backed increased U.S. intervention abroad. Throughout his Senate career, Rubio advocated for Israeli military actions against Gaza and has called for greater U.S. confrontation with Iran. His support of the attempted coup in Venezuela and ongoing advocacy for sanctions against nations perceived as U.S. adversaries have established him as one of Congress’s most staunch proponents of a neoconservative agenda.
As early as 2023, Rubio’s rhetoric around U.S.-China relations placed him in alignment with Trump’s recent national security pick, Representative Mike Waltz. Both Trump allies have voiced support for heightened military and economic pressures on China, a stance that many foreign policy experts believe could contribute to heightened global tensions.
While Trump positioned himself as a candidate of peace during his campaign, particularly with Vice President-elect JD Vance describing him as such, his emerging Cabinet choices reveal a distinctly hawkish tilt. Jeremy Scahill of Drop Site noted that Trump’s national security team increasingly appears to resemble “a kettle of hawkish neocons,” specifically citing both Rubio and Waltz as examples.
Scahill labeled Rubio a “B-list neocon warmonger” and underscored the implications of Rubio’s selection for U.S.-Israel relations. Rubio’s record indicates that he will likely continue his unyielding support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has aggressively expanded military actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.
Ryan Grim, an analyst with Drop Site, went further to underscore that Rubio’s presence in Trump’s Cabinet is “a huge win” for Netanyahu, adding that “Marco Rubio is a rabid neocon” who “never met a war he didn’t want somebody else to fight.”
With the incoming GOP-controlled Senate, Trump is not expected to encounter significant obstacles in confirming Rubio or any other senior administration picks. Trump has reportedly pushed Senate leadership to consider authorizing recess appointments, allowing him to bypass potential delays.
However, even without these maneuvers, analysts agree that Rubio’s confirmation is virtually assured due to strong Republican support and little resistance expected from moderate senators. Trump’s choice to elevate figures like Rubio and Waltz raises concerns that he is building a foreign policy team committed to escalating U.S. involvement in regional conflicts across the globe.
The decision to position Rubio as Secretary of State has drawn criticism from advocates who argue that U.S. diplomacy under Rubio could revert to a more forceful, interventionist approach reminiscent of the early 2000s. Critics argue that Rubio’s foreign policy track record indicates a readiness to support extended military engagements, often at the expense of diplomatic alternatives. Kaniela Ing, national director of the Green New Deal Network, expressed concern over Rubio’s track record, stating, “Rubio supported for-profit wars in Iraq, Afghanistan longer than anyone should.” Ing added, “He’s one of Netanyahu’s top apologists, blindly fueling the ongoing genocide in Gaza.”
Progressive voices also point to Trump’s other likely appointments, such as Elise Stefanik for United Nations ambassador, as indicative of a foreign policy shift aligned with neoconservative and far-right Israeli policies. Stefanik, a close Trump ally, has taken a hardline stance on U.S.-Israel relations, advocating for the defunding of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) based on contested claims that some of its employees may be affiliated with Hamas. Her campaign finances reveal substantial support from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), totaling over $900,000. These funds align her closely with lobbying interests that push for unyielding U.S. backing of Israel’s military actions.
Craig Mokhiber, a former UN human rights attorney, highlighted the concerning trajectory of Trump’s appointments. “The U.S. always sends AIPAC-approved Israel shills [as U.N. ambassadors],” Mokhiber stated, adding that Stefanik’s selection is emblematic of “the rapid decline of the U.S. on the world stage.”
As Trump’s Cabinet materializes, progressive leaders and policy analysts warn of a potential return to an expansionist foreign policy that prioritizes U.S. power and interests over multilateral diplomacy and restraint. Trump’s reported disregard for traditional diplomatic norms raises the specter of a more isolated, and possibly volatile, international presence under his leadership.
Brian Hook, rumored to be involved in the State Department’s transition efforts, exemplifies this trend. Known as a chief architect of Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, Hook’s potential influence over U.S. foreign policy during Trump’s second term could entrench policies of punitive sanctions, cyber operations, and military provocations, diminishing avenues for diplomatic engagement with nations like Iran.
Trump’s foreign policy appointments, including Rubio, signal a strategic shift that prioritizes unilateral actions and military might over international cooperation. The selection of Rubio for Secretary of State demonstrates Trump’s commitment to implementing a hawkish, interventionist agenda, despite his self-characterization as a “candidate of peace” during the campaign.
Amid mounting concerns over Trump’s foreign policy direction, Kaniela Ing remarked on the administration’s path forward: “Trump’s non-interventionist, anti-establishment mask is off. Millions of you got had.”
COMMENTS