Trump condemns Iowa poll showing Harris in the lead, calls for criminalization of ‘suppression’ polls

Describing the well-regarded poll as “suppression,” Trump claimed it was skewed against him and called for it to be made “illegal,” raising concerns about his ongoing attacks on press freedom and the electoral system.

25
SOURCENationofChange

A new Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll, showing Vice President Kamala Harris leading former President Donald Trump by a slight margin, has spurred an aggressive response from the Republican nominee. Trump’s reaction reflects a troubling trend of discrediting credible polling and casting doubt on democratic processes. Describing the well-regarded poll as “suppression,” Trump claimed it was skewed against him and called for it to be made “illegal,” raising concerns about his ongoing attacks on press freedom and the electoral system.

The poll, released just days before the election, found that Harris had a 47 to 44 percent lead over Trump among likely Iowa voters, a three-point margin that, while within the poll’s margin of error, represents a significant shift in voter sentiment. Iowa, traditionally a stronghold for Trump in previous elections, is now leaning toward Harris. Pollster J. Ann Selzer, responsible for conducting the survey on behalf of the Des Moines Register, noted that Harris’s rise in support is largely due to an increase in likely voters rather than a decrease in Trump’s base. “Our analysis then was, it wasn’t that people were switching their allegiances [from the poll in June], it was that more people were qualifying as likely voters in September…. [who said] they will definitely vote” in this year’s race, Selzer explained. She added that the trend continued in the latest poll, with Harris emerging as the “clear leader in Iowa.”

Trump’s response to the poll was immediate and forceful. He took to his Truth Social platform to denounce the poll’s findings, calling it “heavily skewed…by a Trump hater” and asserting that its release was an act of “suppression.” During a rally following the poll’s publication, he went further, suggesting that publishing such polls “should be illegal.” Trump’s rally comments are part of a familiar pattern of attacking institutions that don’t align with his self-narrative, even if he previously praised those same sources. Less than a year ago, Trump celebrated the Des Moines Register poll as “a big beautiful poll” and called Selzer “a great pollster—actually very, very powerful pollster, very good, talented pollster.”

Trump’s condemnation of the poll reveals a broader strategy to undermine confidence in credible polling sources, a tactic he has often used when faced with unfavorable data. Historically, Trump has shown an aversion to unfavorable polling, frequently calling it “fake” or “biased” rather than examining its methodologies or sources. Selzer’s work, however, is respected across political spectrums. Her last Iowa poll in the 2020 election cycle predicted Trump’s victory margin with remarkable accuracy, coming within one percentage point of the final result. While every poll could theoretically be an outlier, Selzer’s track record suggests that her methods are both sound and reliable.

Trump’s rhetoric regarding the poll is more than just campaign bluster; it exemplifies an authoritarian tactic that casts doubt on democratic institutions, particularly those associated with public opinion and press freedom. Referring to unfavorable poll results as “suppression” and “illegal” sets a dangerous precedent, particularly when the statements come from a major political figure with a substantial following. The act of discrediting or criminalizing polls threatens to weaken the foundations of open discourse, suggesting that information unaligned with a particular political viewpoint should be disallowed.

This approach echoes Trump’s history of undermining public trust in the press. Throughout his political career, he has called journalists the “enemy of the people” and suggested that media critical of his administration is untrustworthy. By labeling the poll as “suppression” and calling for its criminalization, Trump is escalating his attempts to de-legitimize the media and any data that does not support his claims. This tactic is particularly troubling for press freedom in the U.S., as it threatens the ability of media organizations to publish unbiased information without fear of retribution.

The response from polling and media experts has been swift. Election integrity analysts have pointed out the dangerous implications of discrediting legitimate polling data. Trump’s strategy of attacking unfavorable polls contributes to a larger environment of skepticism toward verified data, which is essential for a transparent and accountable democracy. By discrediting polls, Trump lays the groundwork for a broader mistrust of institutions that provide objective information to the public, a mistrust that could have serious implications for future elections.

Moreover, Trump’s authoritarian rhetoric about “suppression” poll results has consequences beyond press freedom. In attacking polls that show him losing support, he not only undermines the specific poll but also instills broader doubts about the reliability of the electoral process. This tactic of casting doubt on the democratic process weakens public confidence, making it more difficult for voters to trust legitimate election results and participate fully in democracy. By creating an environment where credible institutions are vilified, Trump erodes the trust that is fundamental to a functioning democracy.

Trump’s comments also risk creating a hostile environment for pollsters, journalists, and other professionals who provide essential insights into public opinion. When public figures cast doubt on the validity of their work, pollsters and journalists face additional scrutiny and threats, which can make it harder for them to carry out their duties without fear of retaliation. Media watchdogs and press freedom advocates warn that such rhetoric, if normalized, could discourage journalists and pollsters from reporting accurately on public opinion, thus limiting the public’s access to essential information.

The reaction from polling experts and media freedom advocates underscores the importance of maintaining trust in reliable polling data. The Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll has been widely respected for its accuracy and objectivity, and attempts to discredit it based on political preferences raise significant concerns about the future of free press and independent polling. As political analyst Amanda Teuscher noted, “The misinformation campaign around polls has foment[ed] distrust… That distrust can be used to push for more restrictions that will make it harder for people to access unbiased data, especially in critical elections.”

The stakes for press freedom and democratic integrity are high. Trump’s statements serve as a reminder of the importance of defending these principles in the face of political attacks that aim to erode public trust. When data is labeled as “illegal” or “suppression” simply because it does not align with a candidate’s narrative, democracy itself is at risk. Protecting independent polling and media from such threats is essential to preserving a transparent and accountable democratic process.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

COMMENTS