Mehdi Hasan warns of rising bigotry in US foreign policy under Trump

By choosing between Trump and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, voters will decide not only the direction of domestic policy but also the position the U.S. will take on critical global issues.

148
SOURCENationofChange

Mehdi Hasan, CNN panelist and founder of Zeteo Media, responded this week to a pointed attack by fellow panelist Ryan Girdusky, underscoring growing concerns about the normalization of bigoted rhetoric within U.S. political discourse. Hasan cautioned that should Republican nominee Donald Trump win the upcoming election, the kinds of individuals willing to make inflammatory and dangerous remarks against Palestinian rights advocates could soon find themselves in key government positions influencing U.S. foreign policy.

Earlier this week, during a CNN Newsnight panel, right-wing commentator and Trump supporter Ryan Girdusky directed a hostile comment at Hasan, saying, “I hope your beeper doesn’t go off,” after Hasan expressed support for Palestinian rights. The comment referenced an incident in mid-September when a series of explosive attacks allegedly led by Israel in Lebanon and Syria killed dozens, including children. Shocked by the statement, Hasan later explained he had “never been so stunned” in 25 years of working in media.

In his response, posted on social media, Hasan described the remark as a glaring example of how far right-wing figures have gone in openly expressing extremist views. He argued that such rhetoric reflects the “boldness” of certain far-right voices in attacking Palestinian advocacy and encouraging violence against perceived enemies, noting that such individuals could soon have control over U.S. foreign policy if Trump wins.

The offensive remark quickly garnered widespread public backlash, with CNN promptly responding by banning Girdusky from future appearances on the network. In a statement, CNN stated, “There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air,” making clear that they would not tolerate such remarks against any of their guests. Following the incident, CNN anchor Abby Phillip issued an apology to Hasan, acknowledging that “a line was crossed,” and affirming the network’s commitment to “thoughtful conversations and debate” without tolerance for demeaning statements.

The exchange, caught live on air, raised concerns among both viewers and public figures regarding the rise of far-right, openly bigoted rhetoric in mainstream media. Prominent author and activist Naomi Klein weighed in, expressing support for Hasan’s warning about the potential normalization of hate-fueled discourse in American politics. Klein’s response underscored a sentiment shared by many that “things absolutely can get worse,” calling for strategic resistance to prevent further far-right entrenchment in politics.

The incident with Girdusky is part of a larger trend of far-right extremism seeping into public discourse, with figures like Girdusky and Trump openly voicing and validating aggressive ideologies. Trump, known for his alignment with far-right and nationalist viewpoints, has praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and described Israeli military actions in Gaza as “a good job,” statements that have faced condemnation by human rights advocates worldwide. Trump’s rhetoric aligns with the views of supporters who are willing to engage in or condone inflammatory attacks, often against advocates for Palestinian rights or individuals seen as standing against the administration’s policies.

Hasan’s warning that a Trump victory could usher extremists into positions of power highlights the potential consequences for U.S. foreign policy, especially concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His comments indicate a growing concern among human rights advocates that foreign policy, which would be shaped by the Trump administration, could support and even encourage aggressive military actions in conflict zones such as Gaza, disregarding the human toll.

The prospect of individuals who promote or excuse extremist ideologies in positions of power has alarmed Palestinian advocates and those who support human rights and international law. With figures who already support inflammatory actions abroad potentially gaining influential roles in U.S. foreign policy, there are fears that policies could shift toward emboldening aggressive foreign actions rather than advocating for peace and negotiation. Hasan noted that “genocide is on the ballot,” as the upcoming election represents a critical choice between supporting or rejecting policies that may continue to marginalize Palestinians.

The danger, Hasan argued, lies not only in the administration’s potential policies but in the normalization of bigoted discourse. He warned that extremists may “be at your kids’ school gate…at your grocery store…[and] in your subway car, proudly and shamelessly saying this stuff to you.” The risk, Hasan emphasized, extends beyond the political sphere to daily life, suggesting that normalized bigotry could foster an environment where hate speech is increasingly tolerated.

The incident with Girdusky and CNN’s response is part of a broader context of rising xenophobia in American politics, especially against Muslim, Arab, and Palestinian communities. Since 2016, the U.S. has seen a dramatic increase in xenophobic rhetoric, with Trump’s campaign promises to institute a “Muslim ban” and enforce aggressive immigration policies reflecting a shift toward open hostility against specific groups. This history has created an environment in which bigoted remarks, such as Girdusky’s comment about Hasan’s “beeper,” no longer shock the public as much as they once might have, a shift that Hasan and other advocates find troubling.

For Hasan and other advocates, the 2024 election represents a pivotal moment. His comments indicate that the election is about more than just a political contest—it is about determining the values that will shape American foreign policy and, by extension, its global influence on human rights. By choosing between Trump and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, voters will decide not only the direction of domestic policy but also the position the U.S. will take on critical global issues.

Hasan made clear his commitment to continue advocating for Palestinian rights and pushing back against bigotry. “I will continue to speak out, I will continue to do the work, and so should you,” he stated in his response to the incident. 

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

COMMENTS