Plastic bottles filled with supposedly clean, pure water have become a ubiquitous part of daily life, lining supermarket shelves and filling landfills worldwide. Despite being marketed as a safer and more convenient alternative to tap water, bottled water is emerging as a major threat to both planetary and human health. Recent studies, including a new commentary published in BMJ Global Health, are now calling for a critical reevaluation of its use. With approximately one million bottles purchased every minute globally, experts are warning that this trend has dire consequences for the environment, public health, and social justice.
Bottled water consumption is rising at an unprecedented rate. Around two billion people worldwide depend on bottled water due to limited access to safe drinking water. However, for the majority of consumers, the reliance on bottled water is a matter of convenience, largely fueled by aggressive marketing campaigns that portray it as a healthier and safer alternative to tap water.
The experts behind the BMJ Global Health commentary are pushing back against these claims. “The widespread use of bottled water contributes significantly to pollution; it exposes people to potentially harmful contaminants and also contributes to greenhouse gas emissions,” said Amit Abraham, lead author and assistant professor of clinical population health sciences at Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar (WCM-Q). Despite these warnings, bottled water demand continues to escalate, threatening the environment and human well-being.
The environmental toll of bottled water is staggering. Plastic water bottles are the second most common pollutant in the ocean, accounting for 12% of plastic waste found in the sea. Most bottles, approximately 91%, are not recycled and end up in landfills, incinerators, or exported to low- and middle-income countries, exacerbating global waste management challenges. This practice raises serious ethical concerns about environmental justice, as wealthier nations offload their waste onto communities that already suffer disproportionately from pollution.
The production of plastic bottles is also a significant driver of greenhouse gas emissions. The extraction of raw materials needed to make plastic bottles, combined with the manufacturing process itself, emits vast amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. Additionally, an enormous amount of water—between 17 and 35 liters—is required to produce just one liter of bottled water, further straining the environment.
Beyond its environmental footprint, bottled water also poses potential health risks. While many consumers assume bottled water is purer and safer than tap water, the reality is far more complex. Research shows that bottled water often contains a range of harmful contaminants, including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, and microplastics.
A recent study cited in the BMJ Global Health commentary found that between 10% and 78% of bottled water samples contained microplastics. These contaminants, particularly BPA, are known endocrine disruptors, which interfere with the body’s hormone systems. Long-term exposure to BPA has been linked to health problems such as high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Moreover, microplastics found in bottled water are linked to oxidative stress, immune system disruption, and changes in blood fat levels.
“While there are short-term safety thresholds, the long-term effects of these contaminants remain largely unknown,” Abraham cautioned, adding that microplastics are also entering the food chain through bottled water consumption. This raises concerns about the cumulative health impacts of consuming bottled water over time.
The environmental and health costs of bottled water are not borne equally across society. The majority of plastic waste generated by bottled water consumption is disposed of in low-income communities, which are least equipped to handle the toxic byproducts. As Abraham pointed out, “It tends to be lower-income communities that bear the brunt of plastic waste and pollution, and in general, the consumption of these plastic water bottles comes from more affluent sections of society.”
This dynamic shows the broader social justice issues tied to bottled water consumption. The individuals and communities most responsible for generating plastic waste are often not the ones facing its consequences. Instead, the burden is placed on already marginalized populations who must contend with pollution, environmental degradation, and limited access to safe, clean drinking water.
Given the significant environmental and health threats posed by bottled water, experts are calling for decisive government intervention. “Collectively, the accumulated evidence underscores the critical role of government interventions and educational campaigns in shifting public perception and behavior,” noted the authors of the BMJ Global Health commentary. They argue that governments must prioritize investments in reliable tap water infrastructure, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to reduce dependence on bottled water.
Governments should also implement policies that restrict single-use plastics and promote access to clean drinking water in public spaces and restaurants. Education campaigns that raise awareness about the environmental benefits and safety of tap water are crucial to shifting consumer behavior away from bottled water.
The solution to the bottled water crisis lies in a collective commitment to prioritizing tap water consumption. By making tap water more accessible, governments and communities can address the multifaceted challenges posed by bottled water, from environmental degradation to health risks and social inequality.
As Abraham and his co-authors emphasize, “By prioritizing tap water consumption, we can collectively address the multifaceted challenges posed by [bottled water] and embrace tap water as a cornerstone of environmental responsibility and public health.”
COMMENTS