Ending oil subsidies and taxing the rich could unlock $5 trillion annually for climate action, report says

The report, released during the United Nations General Assembly talks and ahead of the COP29 climate summit, outlines a series of proposals that could shift resources away from environmentally harmful practices and toward sustainable development.

337
SOURCENationofChange

A new report by Oil Change International (OCI) estimates that rich countries could mobilize over $5 trillion a year to tackle the climate crisis. By ending fossil fuel subsidies, imposing taxes on polluters, and implementing a wealth tax on billionaires, governments could raise significant funds to finance global climate action. The report, released during the United Nations General Assembly talks and ahead of the COP29 climate summit, outlines a series of proposals that could shift resources away from environmentally harmful practices and toward sustainable development.

The report emphasizes that while developing countries are demanding at least $1 trillion a year in public funds to cut emissions and cope with the impacts of extreme weather, wealthy nations have fallen far short of their promises. Even with ongoing negotiations, financial commitments remain insufficient. However, the report argues that the lack of climate finance isn’t due to a lack of resources, but rather political inaction. As OCI’s public finance lead, Laurie van der Burg, noted, “Last year, countries agreed to phase out fossil fuels. Now it’s time for rich countries to pay up to turn that promise into action.”

Breaking down the numbers

According to the OCI report, the potential sources of climate finance are vast:

Ending Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Currently, global subsidies for fossil fuels total $2.6 trillion annually. Redirecting even a fraction of these subsidies to climate action could significantly advance global decarbonization efforts. In the rich world alone, cutting these subsidies would free up $846 billion a year.

Climate Damages Tax: The report proposes a tax on fossil fuel extraction that could generate $618 billion annually. This tax would hold corporations accountable for their contributions to environmental damage and direct those funds toward climate resilience, particularly in vulnerable countries.

Corporate and Wealth Taxes: A 25% minimum corporate tax rate would generate $479 billion annually. Furthermore, a wealth tax on billionaires could raise an additional $2.6 trillion each year in the Global North and $5.6 trillion globally. These funds could be channeled to climate initiatives, helping developing nations build sustainable infrastructure and mitigate climate risks.

As highlighted in the report, the urgency to act is clear. Global North countries—responsible for the lion’s share of historical emissions—have a responsibility to support the Global South, where the impacts of climate change are felt most acutely. These proposals offer a blueprint for how wealthy nations can meet their obligations and drive meaningful progress.

The timing of the OCI report is critical, as the world faces unprecedented environmental challenges. Record-breaking heatwaves, wildfires, and floods have devastated communities worldwide, demonstrating the urgent need for climate action. As Andreas Sieber, associate director of policy and campaigns at 350.org, warned, “The real question isn’t whether we can afford to act, but whether we can afford not to.” Sieber emphasized that ignoring the need for climate finance will only worsen the crisis and exacerbate global inequality.

Rich nations, despite facing their own climate challenges, are often shielded from the worst impacts due to their resources. In contrast, low-income countries suffer the most, with extreme weather events and climate-induced disasters disproportionately affecting them. The need for global solidarity and financial assistance has never been greater.

While the financial resources are available, significant political and economic hurdles remain. Fossil fuel companies and wealthy individuals who benefit from the current system are likely to resist efforts to cut subsidies and increase taxes. These industries have long lobbied against climate action, using their influence to delay meaningful reforms.

Moreover, political leaders in some wealthy nations continue to frame climate finance as a zero-sum game, pitting environmental protection against economic growth. This narrative ignores the reality that investing in climate action is an investment in long-term stability and security. As the report highlights, the transition to renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and resilient infrastructure will create jobs, improve public health, and protect communities from future climate shocks.

However, without the political will to implement these changes, the status quo will continue. Wealthy countries will keep subsidizing fossil fuels, and corporations will keep evading taxes—leaving vulnerable populations to bear the brunt of climate change.

The upcoming COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan will be a critical moment for global leaders to commit to ambitious climate finance goals. The success of last year’s pledge to transition away from fossil fuels depends on rich nations stepping up and providing the necessary funds. The OCI report serves as a reminder that the money exists—the challenge lies in reallocating it from harmful practices to sustainable solutions.

The proposals outlined in the report, including a wealth tax on billionaires, corporate taxes, and the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies, offer a pathway to raising the trillions of dollars needed for climate action. But these measures require bold leadership and a willingness to confront powerful interests.

As the climate crisis intensifies, wealthy nations have an ethical and practical obligation to lead the fight against environmental degradation. The money needed to avert climate catastrophe exists—it’s simply a matter of political will. Redirecting fossil fuel subsidies, taxing the wealthy, and holding corporations accountable for their emissions are not just viable options; they are necessary steps toward a sustainable future. As Andreas Sieber put it, “The money exists, but the political will does not.”

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

[give_form id="735829"]

COMMENTS